Each review opens with a verdict you can act on, then shows its work: what the course teaches, how its method holds up against the evidence, and whether it is built so you can really learn it. The scores come from the same rubric, every time, which is what lets our reviews make concrete comparisons instead of vague praise.

How to use these reviews

A high teaching score does not automatically mean we recommend a course. A low method score can cap the verdict when the tool choice creates avoidable welfare risk. That is why the two scores sit side by side: one tells you what the dog is asked to live with, and one tells you whether the human can actually learn the material.

For the framework behind the scores, read how we grade. For the science behind the method score, start with the science of dog training.